Johnson v. Board of Commissioners

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Johnson v. Board of Commissioners

116 A.2d 161, 1955 D.C. App. LEXIS 195

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 25, 1955

DocketNo. 1667

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 A.2d 161 (Johnson v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Board of Commissioners, 116 A.2d 161, 1955 D.C. App. LEXIS 195 (D.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a review of an order of the Board of Revocation and Review of Hackers’ Identification Licenses.¹ Respondent has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The motion must be granted. The Act of August 31, 1954, Code 1951, Supp. III, § 11-772(e, f), gave this court jurisdiction to review orders of numerous agencies of the District of Columbia relating to issuance, suspension, and revocation of licenses, but it did not include review of orders of the agency here involved. Petitioner’s remedy, if any, would appear to be by way of injunction in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. See Silver v. McCamey, D.C.Cir., 221 F.2d 873.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a review of an order of the Board of Revocation and Review of Hackers’ Identification Licenses.¹ Respondent has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The motion must be granted. The Act of August 31, 1954, Code 1951, Supp. III, § 11-772(e, f), gave this court jurisdiction to review orders of numerous agencies of the District of Columbia relating to issuance, suspension, and revocation of licenses, but it did not include review of orders of the agency here involved. Petitioner’s remedy, if any, would appear to be by way of injunction in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. See Silver v. McCamey, D.C.Cir., 221 F.2d 873.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.2d 161, 1955 D.C. App. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-board-of-commissioners-dc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack