Johnson v. Barrett

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 19, 2020·No. 2:17-cv-02304·Unknown

Opinion

Attorney General MATTHEW P. FEELEY (Bar No. 13336) Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 East Washington Avenue Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 486-3120 (phone) (702) 486-3773 (fax) Email: mfeeley@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants Regina Barrett, Christopher Harris, Julio Mesa, and Timothy Knatz

LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Case No. 2:17-cv-02304-RFB-BNW

Plaintiff,

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF, REGINA BARRETT, et al., A PERSON CONFINED IN PRISON

Defendants.

Defendants Regina Barrett, Christopher Harris, Julio Mesa, and Timothy Knatz, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and Matthew P. Feeley, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, hereby move for leave to depose Plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson, a person confined in prison. Defendants’ motion is made and based on Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the following memorandum of points and authorities. /// /// /// This is a prisoner civil rights matter. Lausteveion Johnson (Plaintiff) is an inmate lawfully incarcerated in the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) and is currently housed at Southern Desert Correctional Center (SDCC). On October 31, 2018, Plaintiff’s Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (Complaint) was filed against various defendants alleging violations of Plaintiff’s First and Eighth Amendment rights. ECF No. 5. On October 31, 2018, This Court issued its Screening Order on Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 5). ECF No. 4. This Court ordered: that a First Amendment interference with free exercise of religion claim shall proceed against Defendant Mesa; a RLUIPA claim shall proceed against Defendant Mesa; an Eighth Amendment claim of sexual assault shall proceed against Defendants Gillmore and Barrett, and a First Amendment retaliation claim shall proceed against Defendants Gillmore, Mesa, Barrett, Knatz, and Harris. ECF No. 4 at 9:15-22. On February 19, 2019, the Office of the Attorney general filed a Notice of Acceptance of Service for Defendants Barrett, Harris, Mesa, and Knatz. Service was not accepted for Defendant Gillmore. ECF No. 15 at 1:21-24. Defendant Gillmore was ultimately dismissed from this action pursuant to Rule 4(m). ECF No. 52 On December 18, 2018, the Court issued its Scheduling Order. ECF No. 72. Pursuant to the scheduling order, discovery is set to end on June 29, 2020. Id. Plaintiff is currently housed at Southern Desert Correctional Center in Indian Springs, Nevada. A party must obtain leave of court if the deponent is confined in prison. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B). The apparent purpose of the rule is to “prevent unnecessary disruption of the administration of the penal institution.” Ashby v. McKenna, 331 F.3d 1148, 1150 (10th Cir. 2003) (quoting Kendrick v. Schnorbus, 655 F.2d 727, 728 (6th Cir. 1981)). /// Defendants desire to take Plaintiff's deposition in this matter to prepare the case for }a dispositive motion or trial. Defendants dispute Plaintiff's factual allegations, and Plaintiff's deposition may be necessary to resolve one or more issues presented in the case. Further, Defendants are former or current prison employees, and defense counsel intends work with prison administrators to schedule the deposition on a date and time that will result in unnecessary or unavoidable disruption to prison operations. Therefore, the Court should grant Defendants leave to take Plaintiffs deposition DATED this 15th day of May, 2020. u Attorney General By:_/s/ Matthew P. Feeley MATTHEW P. FEELEY (Bar. No. 13336) IT IS SO ORDERED Deputy Attorney General

pegs 18 Ore Chetan her Harris DATED: May 18, 2020 Julio Mesa, and Timothy Knatz

Sx Lea Arba

I certify that I am an employee of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, and that on May 15, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF, A PERSON CONFINED IN PRISON via this Court’s electronic filing system. Parties who are registered with this Court’s electronic filing system will be served electronically. For those parties not registered, service was made by emailing a copy at Las Vegas, Nevada, addressed to the following:

Lausteveion Johnson, #82138 Southern Desert Correctional Center P.O. Box 208 Indian Springs, Nevada 89070 Email: sdcclawlibrary@doc.nv.gov Plaintiff, Pro Se

/s/ Carol A. Knight CAROL A. KNIGHT, an employee of the Office of the Nevada Attorney General

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Barrett, (D. Nev. 2020).

Johnson v. Barrett (Johnson v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashby v. McKenna
331 F.3d 1148 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
Kendrick v. Schnorbus
655 F.2d 727 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)