Johnson v. Barrett
This text of 107 S.E. 168 (Johnson v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The writ of certiorari does not lie to correct a judgment of an inferior judiciatory until after a final determination of the cause. A judgment of an inferior judiciatory overruling a demurrer to a petition not being a final determination of the cause, the writ of certiorari does not lie to review such judgment where the cause is still pending in the trial court and before it has been finally determined. Singer Mfg. Co. v. McNeal Paint & Glass Co., 117 Ga. 1005 (44 S. E. 801); Everidge v. Berrys, 93 Ga. 760 (20 S. E. 644); Civil Code, (1910), § 5188.
2. The judge of the superior court therefore erred in sustaining a petition for certiorari which sought, before a final determination of the cause, to review a judgment of a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta overruling a general demurrer to a petition.
Judgment reversed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.E. 168, 26 Ga. App. 781, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-barrett-gactapp-1921.