Johnson v. Barber

Illinois Supreme Court

Johnson v. Barber

9 Ill. 1

DecidedDecember 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Ill. 1 (Johnson v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Barber, 9 Ill. 1 (Ill. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. The record shows that the appeal was prayed by the “defendants,” and not by one of them. The order of the Circuit Court required that they file a bond, but Peter H. Johnson only has executed it. The order has not been complied with, and as has before been decided by this Court in the cases of Carson v. Merle, 3 Scam. 168, Ryder v. Stevenson, ib. 539, and Watson v. Thrall, 3 Gilm. 69, the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. The record shows that the appeal was prayed by the “defendants,” and not by one of them. The order of the Circuit Court required that they file a bond, but Peter H. Johnson only has executed it. The order has not been complied with, and as has before been decided by this Court in the cases of Carson v. Merle, 3 Scam. 168, Ryder v. Stevenson, ib. 539, and Watson v. Thrall, 3 Gilm. 69, the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Ill. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-barber-ill-1847.