Johnson v. Ballard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Johnson v. Ballard

42 N.E. 364, 14 Ind. App. 62, 1895 Ind. App. LEXIS 323

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 12, 1895

DocketNo. 1,561

StatusPublished

This text of 42 N.E. 364 (Johnson v. Ballard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Ballard, 42 N.E. 364, 14 Ind. App. 62, 1895 Ind. App. LEXIS 323 (Ind. Ct. App. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Gavin, C. J.

The only errors assigned in this court are that the court below erred in overruling the motion for a new trial, and in rendering judgment against appellants on the finding.

The causes for a new trial relate to the sufficiency of the evidence. There is in the record no bill of exceptions bringing in or attempting to bring in the evidence or any part of it.

There was a general finding in favor of the appellee, judgment was properly rendered upon it for the amount found due appellee.

No error appears in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI