Johnson v. Baldwin

Eighth Circuit

Johnson v. Baldwin

426 F. App'x 475

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 22, 2011·No. No. 10-3573·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Patrick Johnson appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful review, we conclude that the denial of substitute counsel was not an abuse of discretion, and that defendants were entitled to summary judgment for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Patrick Johnson appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful review, we conclude that the denial of substitute counsel was not an abuse of discretion, and that defendants were entitled to summary judgment for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Johnson v. Baldwin, 426 F. App'x 475 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

426 F. App'x 475 (Johnson v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related