Johnson v. Atwood
This text of 48 P. 600 (Johnson v. Atwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This proceeding was brought to review the rulings and judgment of the District Court of Cloud County, upon a motion to confirm the sale of real estate. The petition in error is based upon a transcript instead of a case-máde. The record does not contain the evidence.
The trial court made special findings of fact. The [347]*347judgment rendered by the trial court is authorized by the findings. We cannot inquire into the findings of fact for the reason the evidence is not before us ; the presumption is that the findings are in accordance with the evidence.
The execution was issued on the fifth day of August, 1893, and the property was sold thereunder on September 11. By section 28, chapter 109, Laws of 1893, paragraphs 4550 and 4551, General Statutes of 1889, sections 453. 453a. of the Code, are expressly repealed ; these are the only sections of our statutes that required or authorized the appraisement of lands offered for sale under execution, and these sections being repealed no appraisement was authorized at the time the execution -in question was issued.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 P. 600, 5 Kan. App. 346, 1897 Kan. App. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-atwood-kanctapp-1897.