Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
This text of 74 S.E. 1103 (Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have examined carefully the several assignments of error set out in the record, and we are of opinion that his Honor properly denied the motion f.or nonsuit.
We think that there was sufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury that the- intestate fell from the car by reason of negligence in giving the signal by the conductor at the moment he did. • We do not deem it necessary to discuss the facts, as these cases differ so materially from each other that a discussion of the evidence is of no material value.
We have examined the charge of his Honor, and think that he presented the case to the jury fairly and fully, and in accordance with the well-settled precedent of this Court.
The judgment of the Superior Court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 S.E. 1103, 159 N.C. 442, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1912.