Johnson v. Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Johnson v. Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services

805 N.W.2d 239, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 690, 2011 WL 5282772

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 26, 2011·No. No. A11-1086·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 19, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

MEYER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[240] BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 19, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

MEYER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[240] BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Johnson v. Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services, 805 N.W.2d 239, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 690, 2011 WL 5282772 (Mich. 2011).

Pincite

805 N.W.2d 239 (Johnson v. Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related