Johnson v. American Mutual Liability Insurance

176 S.E. 907, 50 Ga. App. 54, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 618
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 29, 1934·No. 23944·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

This is a suit under the Georgia workmen’s compensation act. Upon the hearing of the claim before Director Whitaker the evidence as to whether the claimant’s physical condition (ulcers on one of her legs) was caused by an accident or by disease was conflicting, and the director’s finding that her condition was the result of disease and not of an accident was authorized; and that finding, being on a question of fact and authorized by the evidence, can not be reviewed by the superior court or this court. The award of the single director denying compensation to the claimant was affirmed by the Department of Industrial Relations, and, subsequently, on appeal, by the superior court. The judge of the superior court did not err in affirming the award of the Department of Industrial Relations.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. American Mutual Liability Insurance, 176 S.E. 907, 50 Ga. App. 54, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

176 S.E. 907 (Johnson v. American Mutual Liability Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

COBB GENERAL HOSPITAL v. Burrell
331 S.E.2d 23 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Hall
69 S.E.2d 802 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Weaver v. Maryland Casualty Co.
191 S.E. 503 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Neal
191 S.E. 393 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)