Johnson v. Aluminum Co. of America

205 F. App'x 152
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2006·No. No. 05-2353·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Emory Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Aluminum Co. of America, 397 F.Supp.2d 688 (M.D.N.C.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Aluminum Co. of America, 205 F. App'x 152 (4th Cir. 2006).

205 F. App'x 152 (Johnson v. Aluminum Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Aluminum Co. of America
397 F. Supp. 2d 688 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)