Johnson v. Allen
35 Ga. 252
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, because there is no such abuse of the discretion of the Court below as to require this Court to interfere. ■ The continuing or dissolving an injunction, on the coming in of the answer, is for the [254]*254sound discretion of the Court below, and this Court will not control this exercise of this discretion, except in a case of manifest abuse.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Allen, 35 Ga. 252 (Ga. 1866).
35 Ga. 252 (Johnson v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stibbs v. Agner & Co.
21 N.W. 657 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1884)
Fuson v. Connecticut General Life Ins.
6 N.W. 7 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1880)