Johnson v. Allen
This text of 35 Ga. 252 (Johnson v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, because there is no such abuse of the discretion of the Court below as to require this Court to interfere. ■ The continuing or dissolving an injunction, on the coming in of the answer, is for the [254]*254sound discretion of the Court below, and this Court will not control this exercise of this discretion, except in a case of manifest abuse.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Ga. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-allen-ga-1866.