Johnson v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad

140 Ala. 412
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1903·Published

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

This cause was tried by the city court without the intervention of a jury, and a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, assessing his damages at one dollar, from which the plaintiff now prosecutes this appeal. The only insistence in argument by the plaintiff is, that the city court erred in not rendering judgment in his favor for the amount paid by him for [413] the transportation of the stock from Gadsden, Alabama, to Meridian, Miss.

There was no evidence, so far as the bill of exceptions in the case discloses, that the plaintiff ever paid the defendant one cent for the transportation of the stock. The bill of lading set out in the record shows the “charges” for transportation, but there is no evidence that the charges were paid.

We find no error in the judgment- rendered, and it will he affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad, 140 Ala. 412 (Ala. 1903).

140 Ala. 412 (Johnson v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.