Johnson v. Agricultural Insurance
This text of 67 A. 751 (Johnson v. Agricultural Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
For the reasons given in the opinion handed down herewith in the case of Daniel J. Johnson and Charles H. Gorley v. Royal Insurance Company of Liverpool, No. 139, January Term, 1907, 218 Pa. 423, the order of the court below of February 27, 1907, making absolute the rule to show cause why the judgment entered for want of a plea should not be set aside and stricken from the record, is reversed at the costs of the defendant company, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for want of a plea is reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A. 751, 218 Pa. 429, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-agricultural-insurance-pa-1907.