Johnson v. Agricultural Insurance

67 A. 751, 218 Pa. 429, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 540
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 27, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 67 A. 751 (Johnson v. Agricultural Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Agricultural Insurance, 67 A. 751, 218 Pa. 429, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 540 (Pa. 1907).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

For the reasons given in the opinion handed down herewith in the case of Daniel J. Johnson and Charles H. Gorley v. Royal Insurance Company of Liverpool, No. 139, January Term, 1907, 218 Pa. 423, the order of the court below of February 27, 1907, making absolute the rule to show cause why the judgment entered for want of a plea should not be set aside and stricken from the record, is reversed at the costs of the defendant company, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for want of a plea is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Royal Insurance
67 A. 749 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A. 751, 218 Pa. 429, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-agricultural-insurance-pa-1907.