JOHNSON, TIMOTHY T. v. GENESEE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
784 CA 11-02510 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
TIMOTHY T. JOHNSON, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF KYRELL JOHNSON, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
V ORDER
GENESEE MANAGEMENT, INC., RURAL HOUSING ACTION CORPORATION, MIG BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., MONROE INSULATION AND GUTTER, INC., AND MONROE INSULATION AND GUTTER, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS MIG BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., BUFFALO (ELLEN B. STURM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA LLC, ROCHESTER (ALISON M.K. LEE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS MIG BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., MONROE INSULATION AND GUTTER, INC., AND MONROE INSULATION AND GUTTER, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS MIG BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.
PETRONE & PETRONE, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (JAMES H. COSGRIFF, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT RURAL HOUSING ACTION CORPORATION.
TREVETT CRISTO SALZER & ANDOLINA P.C., ROCHESTER (ERICA M. DIRENZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT GENESEE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered March 23, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motions of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JOHNSON, TIMOTHY T. v. GENESEE MANAGEMENT, INC. (JOHNSON, TIMOTHY T. v. GENESEE MANAGEMENT, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.