Johnson, Robert v. Apna Ghar Inc

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 21, 2003·No. 01-2015·Published

Opinion

filim’teh flaws Qtuurt of gppeamjr

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 21, 2003

Before Hon- WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

ROBERT JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of

No. 01—2015 v. Illinois, Eastern Division.

APNA GHAR, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.

NO. 00 C 7752

Milton I- Shadur,

l l l l l l l l ] Judge.

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CLARIFY OPINION, filed on June 24, 2003, by the pro se appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The opinion of this court, iSSUed on June 4, 2003, is AMENDED as follows: On page 9, the final sentence of the opinion is amended to read:

For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the district court is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opiniOn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson, Robert v. Apna Ghar Inc, (7th Cir. 2003).

Johnson, Robert v. Apna Ghar Inc (Johnson, Robert v. Apna Ghar Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.