Johnson, Robert Thomas Ii

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 2017
DocketWR-86,139-01
StatusPublished

This text of Johnson, Robert Thomas Ii (Johnson, Robert Thomas Ii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson, Robert Thomas Ii, (Tex. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-86,139-01

EX PARTE ROBERT THOMAS JOHNSON, II, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 15CR3165-83-1 IN THE 56TH DISTRICT COURT FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

amphetamine and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his sentence violates due process because the evidence in his case

was tested and determined to be amphetamine in an FDA-approved form. See TEX . HEALTH &

SAFETY CODE § 481.116(b). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex

parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). However, the record in this case is

incomplete. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 2

334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall supplement the record with the lab report showing that the evidence was

tested and determined to be amphetamine in an FDA-approved form. The trial court shall also make

any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 11, 2017 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Mable, Kendrick
443 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson, Robert Thomas Ii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-robert-thomas-ii-texcrimapp-2017.