Johnson, Paul Edward
This text of Johnson, Paul Edward (Johnson, Paul Edward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,287-01
EX PARTE PAUL EDWARD JOHNSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20150D05061-41-1 IN THE 41ST DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of murder (Count I) and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon
(Count II). He was sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment for Count I and ten years’ imprisonment
for Count II, to run concurrently. Applicant’s confinement for Count II was suspended, and he was
placed on community supervision for ten years. The Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions.
Johnson v. State, No. 08-17-00156-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Aug. 9, 2019) (not designated for
publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,
and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective and that the State
withheld both impeachment and exculpatory evidence. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, 2
might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Brady v. Maryland, 373
U.S. 83 (1963). There is no response from counsel in the habeas record or findings from the trial
court. Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for
findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel
to respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. In developing the record, the trial
court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,
it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented
by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE
CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify
this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make specific
findings addressing Applicant’s Brady v. Maryland claim. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: April 14, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson, Paul Edward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-paul-edward-texcrimapp-2021.