Johnson-Nelson Painting Co. v. Barde

267 P. 1119, 125 Or. 561, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 175
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedApril 16, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 267 P. 1119 (Johnson-Nelson Painting Co. v. Barde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson-Nelson Painting Co. v. Barde, 267 P. 1119, 125 Or. 561, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 175 (Or. 1928).

Opinion

BELT, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon a dwelling-house and garage owned by Edith Barde, wife of the defendant J. N. Barde. The lien is on account of labor performed in the painting of these buildings. The sole defense is that the work was not performed in a skillful and proper manner and that it was necessary to repaint the greater part of the house at a cost exceeding the amount alleged to be due on plaintiff’s claim.

Questions of fact — not of law — are involved. After an examination of the record we see no good reason to disturb the findings of the trial court. A recital of the evidence in support of our conclusion is not deemed necessary.

The decree of foreclosure is affirmed'.

Affirmed.

Band, C. J., and Bean and McBride, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 P. 1119, 125 Or. 561, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-nelson-painting-co-v-barde-or-1928.