Johnson, Mullan & Brundage, P.C. v. Folkman

305 A.D.2d 1087, 759 N.Y.S.2d 420
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 2003·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ark, J.), entered January 24, 2002, which awarded plaintiff a money judgment of $83,254.82.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages arising from legal services rendered pursuant to a retainer agreement with defendant. Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $42,230.89, plus interest, costs and disbursements. Contrary to defendant’s contention, there are no issues of fact precluding summary judgment (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Plaintiff withdrew its claim of entitlement to certain billed services and/or disbursements and thereby removed any issues of fact raised by defendant in opposition to plaintiff’s motion. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson, Mullan & Brundage, P.C. v. Folkman, 305 A.D.2d 1087, 759 N.Y.S.2d 420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 1087 (Johnson, Mullan & Brundage, P.C. v. Folkman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)