JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON, INC. v. TAMMY SIRMONS, etc

District Court of Appeal of Florida

JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON, INC. v. TAMMY SIRMONS, etc

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 12, 2020

Docket20-0884

StatusPublished

This text of JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON, INC. v. TAMMY SIRMONS, etc (JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON, INC. v. TAMMY SIRMONS, etc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON, INC. v. TAMMY SIRMONS, etc, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON, INC., a foreign corporation for profit, Appellant,

v.

TAMMY SIRMONS, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF CLEVELAND ODOM and RUBIE ODOM, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ANGELICA ODOM, Appellees.

No. 4D20-0884

[November 12, 2020]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Janet Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312017CA000881.

Diane H. Tutt of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for appellant.

F. Malcolm Cunningham, Jr. and Amy L. Fischer of The Cunningham Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Lorenzo Williams and Elaine James of Gary, Williams, Parenti, Watson & Gary, P.L., Stuart, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI