Johnson, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Mendoza)
This text of Johnson, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Mendoza) (Johnson, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Mendoza)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JEFFREY L. JOHNSON, M.D.; AND No. 70569 RADIOLOGY SPECIALISTS, LTD., Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FILED AND THE HONORABLE JAMES JUL 1 3 2016 CROCKETT, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and ERIC MENDOZA; MICHELLE MENDOZA, PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF CHARLES MENDOZA; SRINIVAS HALTHORE, M.D.; AND HALTHORE JOHNS PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY ASSOCIATES, LTD., Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment in a medical malpractice action. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is not warranted. NRS 34.160; Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Because resolution of the issues presented in the petition will not resolve the claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress, petitioners' explanation as to why an appeal from a final judgment would not afford them an adequate remedy is unpersuasive. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004); Moore v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 96 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
931 1947A e Nev. 415, 417, 610 P.2d 188, 189 (1980) (determining that mandamus is not an appropriate remedy when resolution of the writ petition will not dispose of the entire controversy). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'
Cherry
Do
—v j. Gibbons
cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Galliher Law Firm Eglet Prince George J. Kunz, P.C. Daehnke Stevens, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk
1 Srinivas Halthore, M.D., and Halthore Johns Pediatric Neurology Associates, Ltd., have filed a motion to join the writ petition. In light of our disposition of the petition, the motion is denied as moot.
SUPREME COUFtT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Mendoza), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-md-v-dist-ct-mendoza-nev-2016.