Johnson Jr., Isaac Joseph v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 19, 2002
• Docket: 14-02-00313-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed December 19, 2002

Affirmed and Opinion filed December 19, 2002.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-00313-CR

ISAAC JOSEPH JOHNSON, SR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 41,195

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of credit card abuse, enhanced to habitual offender status by allegations of six prior felony convictions.  At the punishment phase, appellant entered a plea of true to each of the enhancement allegations.  The jury assessed punishment, and on April 3, 2002, the court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record.  No request to review the record or pro se response has been filed, however.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed December 19, 2002.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Hudson and Fowler.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).