Johnson & Johnson v. Herold

D. New Jersey

Johnson & Johnson v. Herold

123 F. 409, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4913

DecidedMay 21, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 123 F. 409 (Johnson & Johnson v. Herold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson & Johnson v. Herold, 123 F. 409, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4913 (D.N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

ARCHBAED, District Judge.

By agreement of the parties this case was heard by the court without a jury, under the provisions of the statute. The facts are substantially the same as those in the case of Johnson & Johnson v. W. D. Rutan, Collector, 122 Fed. 993. In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in that case, judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,161.10, being the amount of internal revenue taxes improperly collected by the defendant, with interest from January 1, 1900, to this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARCHBAED, District Judge.

By agreement of the parties this case was heard by the court without a jury, under the provisions of the statute. The facts are substantially the same as those in the case of Johnson & Johnson v. W. D. Rutan, Collector, 122 Fed. 993. In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in that case, judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,161.10, being the amount of internal revenue taxes improperly collected by the defendant, with interest from January 1, 1900, to this date.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 F. 409, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-johnson-v-herold-njd-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack