Johnson & Johnson v. Herold

D. New Jersey

Johnson & Johnson v. Herold

123 F. 409, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4913

District Court, D. New Jersey·Decided May 21, 1903·Published

Opinion

ARCHBAED, District Judge.

By agreement of the parties this case was heard by the court without a jury, under the provisions of the statute. The facts are substantially the same as those in the case of Johnson & Johnson v. W. D. Rutan, Collector, 122 Fed. 993. In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in that case, judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,161.10, being the amount of internal revenue taxes improperly collected by the defendant, with interest from January 1, 1900, to this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARCHBAED, District Judge.

By agreement of the parties this case was heard by the court without a jury, under the provisions of the statute. The facts are substantially the same as those in the case of Johnson & Johnson v. W. D. Rutan, Collector, 122 Fed. 993. In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in that case, judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,161.10, being the amount of internal revenue taxes improperly collected by the defendant, with interest from January 1, 1900, to this date.

Johnson & Johnson v. Herold, 123 F. 409, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4913 (D.N.J. 1903).

Pincite

123 F. 409 (Johnson & Johnson v. Herold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related