Johnson, Ex Parte Carl Paul

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 15, 2004
DocketAP-75,011
StatusPublished

This text of Johnson, Ex Parte Carl Paul (Johnson, Ex Parte Carl Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson, Ex Parte Carl Paul, (Tex. 2004).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. 75,011 & 75,012
EX PARTE CARL PAUL JOHNSON, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O P I N I O N

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. Applicant pleaded guilty to capital murder and attempted capital murder and was sentenced to life in prison for each offense. Applicant filed pro se notice of appeal in each cause but the appeals were dismissed. Johnson v. State, Nos. 02-00-00271, 272-CR (Tex. App. -- Fort Worth, delivered October 5, 2000).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was denied an opportunity to file a petition for discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not timely notify him of the result of his appeal or that he could seek discretionary review, pro se. The trial court found that Applicant was denied the opportunity to file a timely petition for discretionary review, and recommended that he be afforded the opportunity to do so.

Habeas corpus relief is granted, in part, and Applicant is granted leave to file out-of-time petitions for discretionary review from his convictions in cause numbers 0760746-A and 0759642-A from Criminal District Court Three of Tarrant County. Applicant is ordered returned to the point at which he can file a meaningful petition for discretionary review. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in the Court of Appeals within thirty days of the date the mandate of this Court has issued.



DELIVERED: September 15, 2004

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson, Ex Parte Carl Paul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-ex-parte-carl-paul-texcrimapp-2004.