Johnson, Daniel Scott
This text of Johnson, Daniel Scott (Johnson, Daniel Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0355-14
DANIEL SCOTT JOHNSON, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
LIMESTONE COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.
O R D E R
Appellant has failed to file copies of his petition for discretionary review as required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b)(2) and Order Requiring Copies (Court of Criminal Appeals Misc. Docket No. 13-004, December 16, 2013). The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(j), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
Filed: May 7, 2014
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson, Daniel Scott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-daniel-scott-texcrimapp-2014.