Johnson, Daniel Martez

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2016
DocketWR-85,705-01
StatusPublished

This text of Johnson, Daniel Martez (Johnson, Daniel Martez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson, Daniel Martez, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,705-01

EX PARTE DANIEL MARTEZ JOHNSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 54,384-B IN THE 181st DISTRICT COURT FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to

fifty years’ imprisonment in the aggravated sexual assault of a child count and twenty years’

imprisonment in each of the indecency with a child counts.

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 2

The record before us reflects that a notice of appeal was not timely filed due to a

miscommunication between trial and appellate counsel. We find that Applicant is entitled to the

opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 54,384-B from

the 181st District Court of Potter County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 28, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson, Daniel Martez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-daniel-martez-texcrimapp-2016.