Johnson, Daniel Martez
This text of Johnson, Daniel Martez (Johnson, Daniel Martez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,705-01
EX PARTE DANIEL MARTEZ JOHNSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 54,384-B IN THE 181st DISTRICT COURT FROM POTTER COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of
aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to
fifty years’ imprisonment in the aggravated sexual assault of a child count and twenty years’
imprisonment in each of the indecency with a child counts.
Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to
timely file a notice of appeal. 2
The record before us reflects that a notice of appeal was not timely filed due to a
miscommunication between trial and appellate counsel. We find that Applicant is entitled to the
opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 54,384-B from
the 181st District Court of Potter County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may
give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful
appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall
be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court
issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps
to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court
issues.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: September 28, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson, Daniel Martez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-daniel-martez-texcrimapp-2016.