Johnson (Craig) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 16, 2013·No. 63057·Unpublished

Opinion

law will make that obvious." State v. Cigic, 639 A.2d 251, 254 (N.H. 1994). Having concluded that Johnson is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Suzanne M. Lugaski Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

1 The fast track statement does not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because the text is not double-spaced. Counsel for Johnson is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson (Craig) v. State, (Neb. 2013).

Johnson (Craig) v. State (Johnson (Craig) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cigic
639 A.2d 251 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1994)