Johnson Co. v. Pacific Rolling Mills Co.

51 F. 762, 2 C.C.A. 506, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1330
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 18, 1892
DocketNos. 33, 34
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 F. 762 (Johnson Co. v. Pacific Rolling Mills Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson Co. v. Pacific Rolling Mills Co., 51 F. 762, 2 C.C.A. 506, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1330 (9th Cir. 1892).

Opinion

McKenna, Circuit Judge.

The patent in this case is for a form of street rails. The patentee in his specifications admits that rails embodying the general features of his rail were old, and we think his special form involved no invention. It was but an obvious application of what had preceded. Judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacKnight v. McNiece
64 F. 115 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1894)
Bowman v. De Grauw
60 F. 907 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 F. 762, 2 C.C.A. 506, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-co-v-pacific-rolling-mills-co-ca9-1892.