Johnson, Carl William

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2007
DocketWR-13,470-14
StatusPublished

This text of Johnson, Carl William (Johnson, Carl William) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson, Carl William, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. 13,470-14
EX PARTE CARL WILLIAM JOHNSON, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 345166-J IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated rape and sentenced to sixty years imprisonment. Applicant's conviction was affirmed by the First Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion. Johnson v. State, No. 01-82-0115-CR (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 18, 1982, no pet.).

In the instant application, Applicant raises grounds for relief which are based on alleged errors relating to a Chapter 64 proceeding. Additionally, Applicant argues that he was denied due process because the State failed to preserve potentially useful evidence and raises a claim of actual innocence. Finally, Applicant alleges prosecutorial misconduct and Batson violations during his trial.

This Court has reviewed Applicant's claim that he was denied due process through the State's failure to preserve potentially useful evidence and has determined that it is without merit. Therefore, it is denied. Applicant is not confined pursuant to any errors in his Chapter 64 proceeding. Therefore, his claims relating to error in his Chapter 64 proceeding are not appropriate for habeas review. Ex parte Baker, 185 S.W.3d 894 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Applicant's remaining claims are barred from review; as such, they are dismissed. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 § 4.



DO NOT PUBLISH

DELIVERED: February 14, 2007

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Baker
185 S.W.3d 894 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson, Carl William, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-carl-william-texcrimapp-2007.