Johnson, Anthony Eugene
This text of Johnson, Anthony Eugene (Johnson, Anthony Eugene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WR-82,850-01 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/12/2015 4:47:37 PM Accepted 2/13/2015 9:00:15 AM ABEL ACOSTA CAUSE NO. WR-82,850-01 and WR-82,850-02 CLERK
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 2/13/12015 AT AUSTIN ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK __________________________________________________
ON APPEAL FROM APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOs. W08-71994-V(A) and W11-00273-V(A) 292nd DISTRICT COURT DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ___________________________________________________
ANTHONY JOHNSON APPLICANT,
V.
STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE ________________________________________________
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW _________________________________________________
BRUCE ANTON STATE BAR NO. 01274700
SORRELS UDASHEN & ANTON 2311 Cedar Springs #250 Dallas, Texas 75201 214/468-8100 214/468-8104 (fax) ba@sualaw.com COMES NOW, Bruce Anton, counsel for Applicant, Anthony Johnson, in this
cause, and moves this court to issue an extension of time to file his findings of fact
and conclusions of law, and in support thereof would show the court as follows:
I.
This writ of habeas corpus is currently pending in the 292nd District Court of
Dallas County, Texas. An evidentiary hearing was held on January 8, 2015 and
counsel is waiting for the records to be completed. Once the records are available,
counsel proposes to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to
Applicant’s claim that he was denied to be present at the beginning of trial, denied a
public trial and received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and that which it
deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas
corpus relief.
II.
Counsel is diligently pursuing this matter, however, an additional 60 days is
required to complete the findings.
III.
No previous extensions have been requested in this matter.
IV.
The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request for extension are
recited above. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned attorney requests
this court to grant an extension of time of 60 days to file findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
/s/ Bruce Anton BRUCE ANTON STATE BAR NO. 01274700
SORRELS UDASHEN & ANTON 2311 Cedar Springs #250 Dallas, Texas 75201 214/468-8100 214/468-8104 (fax) ba@sualaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of Appellant’s motion for
extension to file findings of fact and conclusions of law was delivered via U.S. Mail
to Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, 133 N. Riverfront, Dallas, Texas 75207
on the 12th day of February, 2015.
/s/ Bruce Anton BRUCE ANTON
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson, Anthony Eugene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-anthony-eugene-texapp-2015.