Johnson, Anthony Eugene

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2015
DocketWR-82,850-01
StatusPublished

This text of Johnson, Anthony Eugene (Johnson, Anthony Eugene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson, Anthony Eugene, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

WR-82,850-01 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/12/2015 4:47:37 PM Accepted 2/13/2015 9:00:15 AM ABEL ACOSTA CAUSE NO. WR-82,850-01 and WR-82,850-02 CLERK

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 2/13/12015 AT AUSTIN ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK __________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOs. W08-71994-V(A) and W11-00273-V(A) 292nd DISTRICT COURT DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ___________________________________________________

ANTHONY JOHNSON APPLICANT,

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE ________________________________________________

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW _________________________________________________

BRUCE ANTON STATE BAR NO. 01274700

SORRELS UDASHEN & ANTON 2311 Cedar Springs #250 Dallas, Texas 75201 214/468-8100 214/468-8104 (fax) ba@sualaw.com COMES NOW, Bruce Anton, counsel for Applicant, Anthony Johnson, in this

cause, and moves this court to issue an extension of time to file his findings of fact

and conclusions of law, and in support thereof would show the court as follows:

I.

This writ of habeas corpus is currently pending in the 292nd District Court of

Dallas County, Texas. An evidentiary hearing was held on January 8, 2015 and

counsel is waiting for the records to be completed. Once the records are available,

counsel proposes to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to

Applicant’s claim that he was denied to be present at the beginning of trial, denied a

public trial and received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and that which it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas

corpus relief.

II.

Counsel is diligently pursuing this matter, however, an additional 60 days is

required to complete the findings.

III.

No previous extensions have been requested in this matter.

IV.

The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request for extension are

recited above. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned attorney requests

this court to grant an extension of time of 60 days to file findings of fact and

conclusions of law.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Bruce Anton BRUCE ANTON STATE BAR NO. 01274700

SORRELS UDASHEN & ANTON 2311 Cedar Springs #250 Dallas, Texas 75201 214/468-8100 214/468-8104 (fax) ba@sualaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of Appellant’s motion for

extension to file findings of fact and conclusions of law was delivered via U.S. Mail

to Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, 133 N. Riverfront, Dallas, Texas 75207

on the 12th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Bruce Anton BRUCE ANTON

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson, Anthony Eugene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-anthony-eugene-texapp-2015.