JOHNSON & Another v. WILKINS

116 U.S. 392, 6 S. Ct. 600, 29 L. Ed. 671, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1771
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 11, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*393 Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is nothing in this record from which it can fairly be inferred that the value of the matter in dispute exceeds five thousand dollars. The suit was ejectment, begun in a State court and removed to the Circuit. Court of the United States, for a lot in Pensacola and the profits thereof since January 1, 1880, of. the yearly value of five hundred dollars. The value of the lot is not stated in any of the pleadings, but in the petition for the removal of the suit it is put at “ more than five hundred dollars.” The recovery was of the lot and rent at fifteen dollars per month from January 1, 1880, until March 1, 1883, or five hundred and seventy dollars in all. If this rental is to be taken as an indication _of the value of the property, it certainly must be less than our jurisdictional limit. As it rests on the plaintiffs in error to show our jurisdiction either from the record or by affidavits, and this has not been done.

The writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHNSON & Another v. WILKINS, 116 U.S. 392, 6 S. Ct. 600, 29 L. Ed. 671, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1771 (1886).

116 U.S. 392 (JOHNSON & Another v. WILKINS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De La Torre v. National City Bank
110 F.2d 381 (First Circuit, 1939)
WELLS & Others v. WILKINS
116 U.S. 393 (Supreme Court, 1886)