Johnson, Alex Bernard v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2004
Docket14-03-00555-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Johnson, Alex Bernard v. State (Johnson, Alex Bernard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson, Alex Bernard v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2004

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00555-CR

NO. 14-03-00556-CR

NO. 14-03-00557-CR

ALEX BERNARD JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 916,099, 916,100, 916,110

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offenses of aggravated sexual assault, aggravated kidnaping, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.  On April 21, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty years for the aggravated assault, life for aggravated kidnaping, and life for aggravated sexual assault.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.


Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Stafford v. State
813 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson, Alex Bernard v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-alex-bernard-v-state-texapp-2004.