Johns v. Williams & Black

66 Miss. 350
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 Miss. 350 (Johns v. Williams & Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johns v. Williams & Black, 66 Miss. 350 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There are two grounds, either of which is sufficient to maintain the jurisdiction of the chancery court and entitle the complainants to relief.

The first is, that complainants are equitable and not legal owners of the land and are seeking the cancellation of a lease made by the trustee in consideration, in part of her private debt to the lessees, and the proper enforcement of the trusts upon which the land is held for them; the other is, that complainants are infants .and for that reason are entitled to invoke the intervention of the court of equity to charge, as baliff or trustee, the recipient of the rents and profits of their lands, even if their title was legal instead of equitable. Carmichael v. Hunter, 4 How. 308; Wathen v. Glass, 54 Miss. 382.

Decree reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rawlings v. Rawlings
83 So. 140 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Miss. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-v-williams-black-miss-1889.