Johns v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Johns v. State

596 So. 2d 685, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 426, 1992 WL 5999

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1992

DocketNo. 90-03153

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 596 So. 2d 685 (Johns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johns v. State, 596 So. 2d 685, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 426, 1992 WL 5999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions and sentences imposed upon appellant after he was found guilty of violating his probation.

We need not and do not address the appellant’s contention that he should not have been sentenced to probation after having been declared a habitual offender. The appellant did not object to that probationary sentence when it was imposed nor did he timely appeal that sentence thereafter. His acceptance of probation constituted a waiver of the right to attack that probation at revocation. See Wolfson v. State, 437 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

We find no merit in any of the remaining issues raised by the appellant.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI