Johns v. State

330 So. 2d 526, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15033
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1976
DocketNo. AA-130
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 330 So. 2d 526 (Johns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johns v. State, 330 So. 2d 526, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15033 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

BOYER, Chief Judge.

By this appeal appellant challenges the judgment and sentence of the trial court which followed a bargained plea of guilty. Although appellant and his attorney specifically waived a presentence investigation, appellant now contends that the trial judge fatally erred in failing to comply with Rule 3.710 RCrP, thus squarely presenting the point which we anticipated but did not specifically answer in Mitchum v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1974, 292 So.2d 620, viz: Whether compliance with said rule may be waived. We hold that it may.

AFFIRMED.

RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. State
366 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Smith v. State
330 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 So. 2d 526, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.