Johns v. Scott

5 Md. 81
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 15, 1853·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Le Grand, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

We concur with the opinion of the chancellor in this case. Besides which, the point involved in it has been expressly decided by this court in the case of Price and Bevans vs. McDonald, et al., 2 Maryland Rep., 403. In that case, as in this, the deed was recorded, but had been defectively acknowledged. The court held, that such registration could not aífect a bona fide purchaser without notice. In the case before us the appellee Scott, swears, in his answer, that he had no knowledge of the previous deed of Reardon and wife to the appellant, and there is no proof to the contrary.

Decree affirmed, and cause sent to Barford county court for further proceedings, under act of 1854, ch. 183.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johns v. Scott, 5 Md. 81 (Md. 1853).

5 Md. 81 (Johns v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pyne v. Hartman Paving, Inc.
745 F.2d 307 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Cloverfields Improvement Ass'n v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc.
373 A.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1977)
Tavenner v. Barrett
21 W. Va. 656 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)
Brydon v. Campbell
40 Md. 331 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1874)
Stevens v. Hampton
46 Mo. 404 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1870)
In re the Insolvent Estate of Leiman
32 Md. 225 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1870)
Cockey v. Milne's lessee
16 Md. 200 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1860)