Johns v. Scaman
832 S.W.2d 20, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1014, 1992 WL 137597
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict entered against them in this court-tried § 1983 suit against prison officials. We affirm. The trial court did not err and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for [21]*21our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johns v. Scaman, 832 S.W.2d 20, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1014, 1992 WL 137597 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
832 S.W.2d 20 (Johns v. Scaman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guadalupe Martinez III v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015