Johns v. Pattee

16 N.W. 280, 61 Iowa 393
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 15, 1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Day, On. J.

— The intervenors filed and submitted with the case a motion to dismiss the appeal, because there is no certificate of the trial judge, as required by section 3T73 of tho Code. The object of this proceeding is simply to cancel and prevent the enforcement of a judgment for $25 and $18.85 costs. The case involves simply the validity of a judgment, and not an interest in real estate. We have held that section 3173 of the-Code applies to chancery cases. See Andrews v. Burdick,* at the present term. See 16 N. W. Rep., 275. As the amount in controversy is less than $100, and there is no certificate of the judge as provided in the statute, it follows that the motion of intervention must be sustained and the appeal must be

Dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johns v. Pattee, 16 N.W. 280, 61 Iowa 393 (iowa 1883).

16 N.W. 280 (Johns v. Pattee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown & Sons v. Smith
41 N.W. 27 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1888)