Johns v. Orcutt

9 Iowa 350
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 19, 1859·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Woodward, J.

A bill in equity brought by the obligor in a title bond, against the obligee, who is the purchaser, to compel him to perform his contract, or to procure the foreclosure and sale of his interest in the property, is in the nature of a local action, and is properly brought in the county where the land lies. Code, sections 1708, 2094, 2095.

Therefore the order of the court, awarding a change of [351]*351venue to a different county from that where the land lay, and giving the defendants a suju of money as their charge for attending in the wrong county, was erroneous.

The judgment of the District Court is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johns v. Orcutt, 9 Iowa 350 (iowa 1859).

9 Iowa 350 (Johns v. Orcutt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Robertson's Estate
68 N.W.2d 909 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1955)
Titus Management Co. v. Kelsey
268 N.W. 23 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1936)
Eckhardt v. Bankers Trust Co.
252 N.W. 373 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Lee v. American Trust & Savings Bank of Lowden
228 N.W. 570 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1930)