Johns v. Lay-Hall Grocery Co.
153 S.E. 72, 170 Ga. 505, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 174
Opinion
1. The plaintiff in fi. fa. failed to carry the burden of proof. The evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The court erred in refusing a new trial.
2. None of the grounds of amendment to the motion for new trial show error. Judgments reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johns v. Lay-Hall Grocery Co., 153 S.E. 72, 170 Ga. 505, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 174 (Ga. 1930).
153 S.E. 72 (Johns v. Lay-Hall Grocery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lay-Hall Grocery Co. v. Johns
161 S.E. 354 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)