Johns v. Horton

Ohio Supreme Court

Johns v. Horton

794 N.E.2d 681, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1529

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 26, 2003

Docket2002-1560

StatusPublished

This text of 794 N.E.2d 681 (Johns v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johns v. Horton, 794 N.E.2d 681, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1529 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-010672, 149 Ohio App.3d 252, 2002-0hio-3802. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellant and amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, to participate in oral argument scheduled for September 23, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appeDant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-010672, 149 Ohio App.3d 252, 2002-0hio-3802. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellant and amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, to participate in oral argument scheduled for September 23, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appeDant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

794 N.E.2d 681, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-v-horton-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack