Johns v. Hastings & Saxton
22 Kan. 464
Opinion
This judgment is affirmed as to plaintiff in error Johns, on the authority of Dickson v. Randal, 19 Kas. 212; and reversed as to the other plaintiffs in error, upon the authority of Monger v. Comm’rs of Harvey Co., ante, p. 318.
The costs of this court will be divided between plaintiff in error Johns, and the defendants in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johns v. Hastings & Saxton, 22 Kan. 464 (kan 1879).
22 Kan. 464 (Johns v. Hastings & Saxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of Commissioners v. Lawrence
23 Kan. 283 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1880)