Johns v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Johns v. Commonwealth of Virginia

65 F. App'x 503

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2003·No. No. 03-6175·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Bernard Johns appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johns v. Virginia, No. CA-02-1687-A (E.D.Va. Dec. 13, 2002). We deny Johns’ [504] motion for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Bernard Johns appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johns v. Virginia, No. CA-02-1687-A (E.D.Va. Dec. 13, 2002). We deny Johns’ [504] motion for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johns v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 65 F. App'x 503 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

65 F. App'x 503 (Johns v. Commonwealth of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.