John's Administrator v. Pardee
This text of 109 Pa. 545 (John's Administrator v. Pardee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
The rule in Walton v. Shelley, was adopted as sound law in this state nearly one hundred years ago. It has continued to be followed ever since. It was so held up to the passage of the Act of 1869 and was not changed by that Act. Even if it was a new question there is great force in declaring it would be bad policy to permit one, who by his indorsement, has put into circulation a commercial instrument, afterwards to aver there was a taint upon it at the time it passed through his hands. We still adhere to the rule. All the evidence given and offered is insufficient to lay any foundation for making Fitzpatrick competent to testify to the facts for which he was offered.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 Pa. 545, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-administrator-v-pardee-pa-1885.