Johnpier v. State

89 So. 3d 996, 2012 WL 1649734, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 11, 2012·No. No. 2D11-2286·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Christopher Johnpier appeals from the sentence imposed on him after his probation was revoked. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to hear any argument on sentencing. We agree and reverse. See Caldwell v. State, 72 So.3d 779, 779 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (citing Estevez v. State, 705 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)) (holding that a probationer must have an opportunity to be heard regarding what sentence should be imposed and to present mitigating evidence).

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Johnpier’s probation but reverse Johnpier’s sentence and remand to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

WHATLEY and MORRIS, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnpier v. State, 89 So. 3d 996, 2012 WL 1649734, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

89 So. 3d 996 (Johnpier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TIMOTHY TURNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
261 So. 3d 729 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Chesser v. State
247 So. 3d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)