Johnny Savell v. Elizabeth C. Teel

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 16, 2011
Docket10-10-00400-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Johnny Savell v. Elizabeth C. Teel (Johnny Savell v. Elizabeth C. Teel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnny Savell v. Elizabeth C. Teel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00400-CV

JOHNNY SAVELL, Appellant v.

ELIZABETH C. TEEL, Appellee

From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 21123C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Johnny Savell attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order holding Savell in

contempt. By letter dated January 26, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Savell that

the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared there was no right to appeal

from an order of contempt. Deramus v. Thornton, 333 S.W.2d 824, 827 (Tex. 1960) (The

validity of a contempt judgment can be attacked only collaterally by a writ of habeas

corpus). Savell was further warned by the Clerk that the Court would dismiss the

appeal unless, within 21 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing

grounds for continuing the appeal. Counsel for Savell responded by letter dated January 31, 2011 requesting a dismissal of the appeal. The letter, however, does not

indicate that it was served on, or even copied to, the other parties to the appeal.

This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.

APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); §

51.941(a) (West 2005); and § 51.208 (West Supp. 2010). Savell did not pay the filing fees

when presenting documents for filing. Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule

and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates

or reduces the fees owed by Johnny Savell.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed February 16, 2011 [CV06]

Savell v. Teel Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deramus v. Thornton
333 S.W.2d 824 (Texas Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnny Savell v. Elizabeth C. Teel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-savell-v-elizabeth-c-teel-texapp-2011.