Johnny Rodriguez v. Gracie Ann Rodriguez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 2002
Docket12-01-00206-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Johnny Rodriguez v. Gracie Ann Rodriguez (Johnny Rodriguez v. Gracie Ann Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnny Rodriguez v. Gracie Ann Rodriguez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

NO. 12-01-00206-CV



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT



TYLER, TEXAS

JOHNNY RODRIGUEZ,

§
APPEAL FROM THE 349TH

APPELLANT



V.

§
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF



GRACIE ANN RODRIGUEZ,

APPELLEE

§
ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

PER CURIAM

Appellant Johnny Rodriguez filed for divorce from his wife, Gracie Ann Rodriguez, in Anderson County, where he is incarcerated by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division. In his petition, he alleged that he had lived in Anderson County for the preceding ninety days, and in the State of Texas for the preceding six months. The trial court sua sponte dismissed the divorce action because Johnny was not a resident of Anderson County. We affirm the trial court's dismissal.

According to Subtitle C, Chapter 6 of the Texas Family Code,



A suit for divorce may not be maintained in this state unless at the time the suit is filed either the petitioner or the respondent has been:



(1) a domiciliary of this state for the preceding six-month period; and

(2) a resident of the county in which the suit is filed for the preceding 90-day period.



Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 6.301 (Vernon Supp. 2002). This residency requirement has been defined as a physical presence in a county, accompanied by a good faith intention to remain and permanently and definitely make that county his home. Randle v. Randle, 178 S.W.2d 570, 572 (Tex. Civ. App.- Galveston 1944, no writ). According to In re Marriage of Earin, 519 S.W.2d 892 (Tex. Civ. App.- Houston [1st Dist.] 1975, no writ), there is no reason that an inmate may not maintain a divorce action in the county where he is imprisoned. But, as with any other petitioner, he must intend to reside in that county permanently after his release from prison. Id. at 893.

In this case, the trial court required Johnny to complete a questionnaire. The court asked him three pertinent questions: 1) prior to his incarceration in Anderson County, where did he live and for how long; 2) the address of any residence in Anderson County where he resided before he was incarcerated; and 3) where he intended to reside after he was released from prison. Johnny responded that before he came to Anderson County, he was an inmate at the Ferguson Unit in Midway, that he had never resided in Anderson County before he was incarcerated there, and that he intended to move to Houston when he was released. Based upon these answers, Johnny was clearly not a resident of Anderson County. Consequently, the trial court did not err when it dismissed the divorce suit for Johnny's failure to comply with section 6.301 of the Texas Family Code.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment of dismissal.



Opinion delivered February 28, 2002.

Panel consisted of Davis, C.J., Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.



(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Marriage of Earin
519 S.W.2d 892 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Randle v. Randle
178 S.W.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnny Rodriguez v. Gracie Ann Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-rodriguez-v-gracie-ann-rodriguez-texapp-2002.