Johnny Richard v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 20, 2014·No. 06-13-00068-CR·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00068-CR

JOHNNY RICHARD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 336th District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CR-12-24305

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. ORDER Johnny Richard has filed a motion asking this Court to provide him with a free copy of

the record. Our opinion affirming his conviction was issued on December 17, 2013. Richard’s

attorney was appointed by the trial court, but has declined to file a motion for rehearing or

request for more time in which to file such a motion. Richard is attempting to file a pro se

motion for rehearing and has filed two motions requesting an extension of the deadline for filing

that motion. Richard’s motion for rehearing is currently due to be filed no later than March 19,

2014.

Richard first contacted this Court on February 18, 2014, attempting to obtain a copy of

the record so that he could prepare his motion for rehearing. This Court contacted his attorney,

who stated that he had never been provided a copy of the record and that he was permitted to

review the reporter’s record only by visiting the district clerk’s office. Richard states that he

contacted the trial court, that he requested a copy of the record, and that his request was denied.

Thus, he filed another motion with this Court attempting to obtain the record.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that in criminal cases, the trial court

clerk and the court reporter must prepare the clerk’s record and reporter’s record in duplicate.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(g), 34.6(h). The Rules also direct that the trial court clerk retain a copy

of the clerk’s record and that the court reporter file a copy of the reporter’s record with the trial

court clerk for use by the parties with permission of the trial court. Id.; see Escobar v. State, 134

S.W.3d 338, 339 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (per curiam). This follows the direction

of Section 52.047 of the Texas Government Code, which requires that an original and a copy of

2 the reporter’s record be prepared when a record is requested. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 52.047

(West 2013).

We recognize that historically, one printed copy of the reporter’s record was filed with

the district clerk, and one printed copy was transmitted to this Court on appeal. That is no longer

the case. All records are filed electronically with this Court, as the reporter’s record was in this

case. The paper copy which the Rules and the Texas Government Code require is for the benefit

of the defendant/appellant and should therefore be provided to him so that he may pursue his

motion for rehearing with some effect.

We have also contacted the warden of the facility in which Richard is incarcerated and

have been informed that there are no computers available to Richard in order to view electronic

copies of any part of the record.

We order the District Clerk of Fannin County to obtain and mail the written duplicate of

the reporter’s record to Richard so that he may complete his motion for rehearing in a timely

fashion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: March 20, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnny Richard v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Johnny Richard v. State (Johnny Richard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sammy Ray Escobar v. State
134 S.W.3d 338 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)