Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin

15 F.3d 145, 94 Daily Journal DAR 1055, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 610, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1290, 1994 WL 19156
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 27, 1994·No. 92-56479·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The judgment of this court 1 having been vacated by the Supreme Court, 114 S.Ct. 539, 126 L.Ed.2d 441, this case is hereby remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2167, 124 L.Ed.2d 391 (1993).

REMANDED.

1

. The April 12, 1993 judgment inaccurately stated that only Judges Browning and Rymer participated in the decision. The judgment should have stated that Judges Browning, Kozinski and Rymer participated in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin, 15 F.3d 145, 94 Daily Journal DAR 1055, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 610, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1290, 1994 WL 19156 (9th Cir. 1994).

15 F.3d 145 (Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related