Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin

15 F.3d 145, 94 Daily Journal DAR 1055, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 610, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1290, 1994 WL 19156
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 1994
Docket92-56479
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 F.3d 145 (Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnny Ray Mahon v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, T. Wilson, Burdette Harris, Frank Nmi Zolin, 15 F.3d 145, 94 Daily Journal DAR 1055, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 610, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1290, 1994 WL 19156 (9th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

The judgment of this court 1 having been vacated by the Supreme Court, 114 S.Ct. 539, 126 L.Ed.2d 441, this case is hereby remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2167, 124 L.Ed.2d 391 (1993).

REMANDED.

1

. The April 12, 1993 judgment inaccurately stated that only Judges Browning and Rymer participated in the decision. The judgment should have stated that Judges Browning, Kozinski and Rymer participated in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 F.3d 145, 94 Daily Journal DAR 1055, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 610, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1290, 1994 WL 19156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-ray-mahon-v-county-of-los-angeles-los-angeles-superior-court-t-ca9-1994.